Anthropic's Fable Backlash, Nationalizing AI, Inflation Heats Up & California's Broken Elections
Episode publishedPodcast: All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sa...All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
Transcript preview
Preview only
Alright, everybody. Welcome back to the number one podcast in the world. It's your favorite podcast. It's your podcaster's favorite podcast. It's the podcast that everybody likes to rip off for 50 episodes and then they quit. But the all in podcast is not quitting. We're doubling down with the original quartet. Everybody's here for a big, big week. Lots of debates, and we gotta start with Anthropic. Anthropic released a mythos level model with some interesting guardrails, and seems as though Dario is back to blogging. Okay. The model's called Fable five. No idea why they're calling it that. Re
It's a really incredible model. And so kudos to these guys for continuing to push the boundaries of the closed frontier lab models. They're firing on all cylinders. I think that it creates a pretty obvious risk now. And I think that obvious risk is twofold. One is Anthropic has essentially shown their hand, which is that they will increasingly take in prompts, evaluate the prompts, and decide what to do with them before they generate output to you. And I think if you were a person, you should generally now think there's a risk of censorship. If you're a company, I think it's almost a nonstarte
Yes.
It's just that the truth sucks when you actually take it and you eat it and you're like, it's in your tummy and you're like, no, this is not good. I don't like this. And so there's the censorship risk on the one hand, and then there's just the governance business risk for enterprises on the other. Both are not good.
Freiburg running your own company now, and I'll let you back clean up here. Sachs, obviously, you'll have a lot to say. But Freiburg running your company, do you worry about getting rug pulled by one of these companies, investing your time into one of these platforms, having them then constrain your use of it, and or take what you're doing at OHalo, put it into their model, and make it available to other people? What what concerns do you have as a business owner at the forefront of your field using these tools?
It's a great question. The the terms of service is pretty clear that they can't take what you're doing and put it into their model that they
won't Do you believe them when you read them?
I'm not sure to be honest. There are things I'm concerned about, but we've decided to throw caution to the wind because we do a lot of proprietary work in genomics. What that means is we're looking at different genes or gene variants, trying to estimate the impact that that gene or gene variant might have on a living organism, like we work in plants, obviously, in agriculture, and we will do things like RNA guide design for gene editing based tools. We will do predictions on what gene may or may not have some phenotype. So there's a lot of genomic modeling work that we have found these models
We see it.
Keep exploring with a free account.
A free account preserves the short preview. Upgrade to Pro for the full transcript and episode chat.
This episode could not be prepared.
Try again to prepare the episode for reading and questions.