Big Take Asia: The US Pledged to Contain China’s Tech Ambitions. It’s Not Working.

As a real estate manager, Principal Asset Management harnesses the power of a 360 degree perspective, delivering local insights and global expertise across public and private equity and debt. Their teams apply local insights and global perspectives to help identify the most compelling investing opportunities. Principal Asset Management, actively invested. Learn more at principleam.com. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Principal Asset Management SM is a trade name of Principal Global Investors LLC.

With Amex Business Platinum, you get 1.5 times membership rewards points on select business purchases. So expanding your inventory scores more points for your business. That's the powerful backing of American Express. Terms and points can apply. Learn more at americanexpress.com/amexbusiness.

Hey, Odd Lots listeners. This episode you're about to hear is from another podcast here at Bloomberg, the Big Take Asia podcast.

And in this episode, you are going to hear about China's efforts to dominate industries of the future. Specifically, it is looking at China's 10 years old made in China plan to see how the country is actually faring when it comes to advancing key technologies. This

episode of Big Take Asia will give you a preview of the next episode of Odd Lots arriving on Thursday when we'll speak with coauthors of a new Bloomberg report. We're gonna be speaking with Bloomberg's Asia government and politics correspondent, Rebecca Choon Wilkins, as well as Bloomberg economic analyst, Gerard Depipo.

They will help us unpack the China 2025 plan and what their research has uncovered. In the meantime, enjoy this episode of the Big Take Asia. Bloomberg Audio Studios.

Podcasts, radio, news.

The US presidential election is a week away, and the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could not be tighter. The 2 candidates are going head to head on everything from the economy to immigration. But one area they agree on is the need to curb China's rise.

We got 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars just from China alone, and I hadn't even started yet. But tariffs are 2 things if you look at it. Number 1 is for protection of the companies that we have here.