Transcript preview
Preview only
We can still meet compliance goals but with less data collection. And I think that that is like, if I could just tattoo one thing onto the brains of policymakers and regulators, it is that sentence.
If your privacy theory can't explain how a vulnerable person would get help, restitution, or protection, then it's not a privacy theory for humans. It's one for ideology. So I think
we're all kind of trying to find our way back to that place where the starting point for privacy is privacy is okay.
He should see some of these tweets where he's like, pretty much anyone who disagreed with him and said, like, terror is falling apart. He was like, you're poor or something like that.
Capital.
Hi, everyone.
And V is out today skiing. We're very jealous. We have FOMO. We told her to have an apres ski drink for us. But today, we are so thrilled to have Jill from espresso with us on the show. Hi, Jill.
Great to be here.
And I'm your host, Katherine, KK, fluent in tradvi TradFi and conversant in deep tech over at StarkWare. So before we get going, remember, we're lawyers, or at least Jesse and I are lawyers, but we're not your lawyers. So nothing you hear on Ducks in the City is legal or financial advice, and it doesn't create an attorney client relationship. For the fine print as usual, check unchainedcrypto.com. Jill, we are so happy to have you here.
Keep exploring with a free account.
A free account preserves the short preview. Upgrade to Pro for the full transcript and episode chat.